Terminal Investment Limited, MSC’s terminal-operating arm, will pay $1.397 billion for 49% of Adani Vizhinjam Port Private Limited, valuing India’s first deep-draft trans-shipment hub at $2.85 billion. Adani Ports called it the largest foreign private investment in Indian port infrastructure.
The deal, announced June 30 by APSEZ, is subject to regulatory approval. TiL takes a minority stake in the concessionaire that runs Vizhinjam, and Adani keeps control. What changes is who has skin in filling the berths.
MSC pulled this port from a rotation six months ago
In January, MSC removed Vizhinjam from its Middle East–Indian Subcontinent–Africa service, ending the carrier’s call at India’s newest hub. At the time it read as a commercial snub during the port’s ramp-up. Adani’s pricing, well below Colombo’s vessel charges, had not been enough to hold the rotation.
Now the same carrier is buying half the terminal.
The two moves are not a contradiction. They are a sequence. A carrier that owns the asset and a carrier that merely calls at it are playing different games. Once TiL holds 49%, every box MSC relays through Vizhinjam pays the carrier twice, once on the freight and once on the terminal’s books. The incentive to fill the port stops being tactical and becomes structural.
The port ramped faster than any Indian hub before it
Commissioned in December 2024, Vizhinjam handled 1.3 million TEUs in its first year and 615 vessels, the fastest Indian port to cross one million TEUs. Within 18 months it passed two million TEUs and 950 vessels. In June 2026 it took its 1,000th ship.
The infrastructure explains the pull. The port sits roughly 10 nautical miles off the East–West shipping route linking Europe, the Gulf and the Far East, with a natural draft of 18 to 20 metres, a 2.9 kilometre breakwater, and an AI-enabled vessel traffic system built by IIT Madras. It has handled more than 70 ultra-large container vessels, the most of any Indian port, plus 98 ships needing drafts deeper than 16 metres. Few ports in the region can take those vessels without dredging. Colombo cannot, comfortably.
ALSO READ:India to absorb 90% of MSME CBAM compliance cost
India loses $220 million a year to foreign hubs
The strategic logic runs underneath the commercial one. About 75% of India’s transshipment cargo still moves through Colombo, Singapore, Salalah and Port Klang, and the country bleeds an estimated $200 to $220 million a year in foreign exchange to handle Indian boxes at foreign quays. Colombo alone handles the majority of it.
That dependence has a geopolitical edge. China Merchants Port Holdings owns 85% of Colombo’s main container terminal and holds a 99-year lease on Hambantota. India routing the bulk of its export-import relay traffic through a hub a strategic competitor effectively controls was never a stable arrangement. Vizhinjam is the answer to a problem that is part economics and part map.
What this means for the transshipment market
Relay cargo that priced its way through Colombo now has a deeper, closer, automated alternative with the world’s second-largest carrier holding equity in it. APSEZ expects the partnership to lift Bangladesh-linked volumes, strengthen East Africa routing, and raise relay traffic, all cargo Southeast Asian hubs currently capture.
The harder question is Colombo’s. A carrier prefers a hub it owns to a hub it rents, and MSC has just chosen which side of that line Vizhinjam sits on.
The port is mid-expansion, scaling capacity 3.5 times to 5.7 million TEUs by December 2028. MSC has now bought a 49% claim on that future capacity, which means it has bought the downside of an empty berth as surely as the upside of a full one. A carrier does not take that position to keep a port off its schedule. Expect Vizhinjam back in MSC’s rotations well before the 2028 berths come online, and expect the volume Colombo lost during its post-2022 congestion to keep migrating south rather than return. The withdrawal in January was the last move of the old relationship. This is the first move of the new one.